Truly attending to the world’s problems would mean abandoning the parochial, nation-centered vision of social democracy for something like a true internationalism.
What are the strategic policy conclusions that you draw from this critique? It sounds like you want Norway to close its borders to immigration from lower wage regions, stop importing goods that are made more cheaply abroad, and sell off all its foreign investments. Is that right? And if so, how do you see this advancing the socialist movement?
-Pay decent wages/salaries to all labor immigrants.
-Support labor rights overseas and discourage unsustainable (incl. labor practices) commodity production.
-Definancialize sovereign wealth and work toward social investments (infrastructure, climate change mitigation, R&D funds, climate reparations, and more).
What are the strategic policy conclusions that you draw from this critique? It sounds like you want Norway to close its borders to immigration from lower wage regions, stop importing goods that are made more cheaply abroad, and sell off all its foreign investments. Is that right? And if so, how do you see this advancing the socialist movement?
-Pay decent wages/salaries to all labor immigrants.
-Support labor rights overseas and discourage unsustainable (incl. labor practices) commodity production.
-Definancialize sovereign wealth and work toward social investments (infrastructure, climate change mitigation, R&D funds, climate reparations, and more).